Saturday, June 5, 2010

Commentary on baby clothes

Yes, that's right. I am writing a whole post just about baby clothes. And it probably won't be the last one either.

First - today was a sad day. I packed away all of Nik's newborn-sized clothes. He's been wearing 0-3 months stuff for a while, but now he's officially no longer a newborn.

Second - what is with the size variation? Yeah, these two sleepers are supposed to be the same size (0-3 months). Hardly.

Note: the green stripes is in the top three of my favorite outfits on Nik.

Third - this sleeper has the shortest legs ever. Seriously they are less than two inches long. Definitely not for our baby!


Okay, that's it for now, but I'll undoubtedly share more opinions later!

3 comments:

Mari said...

Yes, I totally get you on this! What baby has hips like that? (the i love daddy one) Diapers aren't THAT big. We have some sleepers with that shape too. How can they be the "same" size and yet so different? Crazy.

Live Out Loud said...

I get weirded out by kids clothes as well...but odly enough even siblings can fit into some things better than others. Having two girls close together, I have noticed that there are somethings (like that number with the 2 inch legs) that Poppy Lu fits in that Lola never did and vise versa. I also hate packing up my kiddies clothing. It hurts every time. Why, WHY do children have to grow up so quickly???!!

jenhatch said...

Isn't it crazy?! I've found that the cheaper baby clothes are for the shortest, and FATEST babies ever! Like I can't even imagine a baby that fits some of those.

Is your favorite sleeper from Children's Place? Looks like it and those are my fave. They are slimming, so they're nice and snug on the babes showing all of those cute baby "curves".